The Headington Shark
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[File:Shark2.jpg|link=File:Shark2.jpg]] | [[File:Shark2.jpg|link=File:Shark2.jpg]] | ||
− | Although the police were informed of the installation taking place, they were unable to take action due to | + | Although the police were informed of the installation taking place, they were unable to take action due to there being no law against a homeowner installing a shark sculpture on their own roof. |
+ | |||
+ | However, it was the immediate focus of controversy, with local residents complaining and Oxford City Council trying to remove it on safety grounds. When this proved unsuccessful they attempted removal because planning permission had not been given. | ||
As time went on though, it became a minor attraction for Oxford and support from local residents’ began to grow. After six years of legal proceedings, central government became involved, with ministers in the Department of the Environment deciding in 1992 that the shark could remain due to not resulting in ‘harm to the visual amenity’. | As time went on though, it became a minor attraction for Oxford and support from local residents’ began to grow. After six years of legal proceedings, central government became involved, with ministers in the Department of the Environment deciding in 1992 that the shark could remain due to not resulting in ‘harm to the visual amenity’. |
Revision as of 13:44, 1 August 2017
See the full Unusual building of the week series here.
The Headington Shark is a terraced house located in Headington, Oxford, that features a sculpture of a large shark on the roof.
Officially called Untitled 1986, the shark sculpture is embedded head-first, giving the impression of it having fallen out of the sky.
It was installed by crane to the roof of 2 New High Street on 9th August 1986 by Bill Heine who said that his motive was “…to express someone feeling totally impotent and ripping a hole in their roof out of a sense of impotence and anger and desperation … it is saying something about CND, nuclear power, Chernobyl and Nagasaki.”
The shark was designed by sculptor John Buckley and built by a local carpenter friend using painted fibreglass. It weighs 200 kg and measures 7.6 m (25 ft) in length.
Although the police were informed of the installation taking place, they were unable to take action due to there being no law against a homeowner installing a shark sculpture on their own roof.
However, it was the immediate focus of controversy, with local residents complaining and Oxford City Council trying to remove it on safety grounds. When this proved unsuccessful they attempted removal because planning permission had not been given.
As time went on though, it became a minor attraction for Oxford and support from local residents’ began to grow. After six years of legal proceedings, central government became involved, with ministers in the Department of the Environment deciding in 1992 that the shark could remain due to not resulting in ‘harm to the visual amenity’.
In August 2007, the shark was renovated by Buckley, and in 2016, Heine’s son bought the house so as to enable its future preservation.
Find out more
Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Avoiding planning permission pitfalls.
- Big Duck.
- Drina river house.
- Fish Building, India.
- Gate Tower Building, Osaka.
- House Attack.
- Planning permission.
- The Hole House.
- Unusual building design of the week.
- Upside Down House, Poland.
Featured articles and news
Infrastructure that connect the physical and digital domains.
Harnessing robotics and AI in challenging environments
The key to nuclear decommissioning and fusion engineering.
BSRIA announces Lisa Ashworth as new CEO
Tasked with furthering BSRIA’s impressive growth ambitions.
Public buildings get half a million energy efficiency boost
£557 million to switch to cleaner heating and save on energy.
CIOB launches pre-election manifesto
Outlining potential future policies for the next government.
Grenfell Tower Inquiry announcement
Phase 2 hearings come to a close and the final report due in September.
Progress from Parts L, F and O: A whitepaper, one year on.
A replicated study to understand the opinion of practitioners.
ECA announces new president 2024
Electrical engineer and business leader Stuart Smith.
A distinct type of countryside that should be celebrated.
Should Part O be extended to existing buildings?
EAC brands heatwave adaptation a missed opportunity.
Definition of Statutory in workplace and facilities management
Established by IWFM, BESA, CIBSE and BSRIA.
Tackling the transition from traditional heating systems
59% lack the necessary information and confidence to switch.
The general election and the construction industry
As PM, Rishi Sunak announces July 4 date for an election.
Eco apprenticeships continue help grow green workforce
A year after being recognised at the King's coronation.
Permitted development rights for agricultural buildings
The changes coming into effect as of May 21, 2024.